Archive for August, 2009

I like hanging out in an area that has its own lighthouse. Aireys Inlet is uncommonly beautiful, and the broad shore beneath its cliffs seems blue and oily at dusk. There’s a little croaking marsh full of frogs and birds, too.

I was in Aireys for its Festival of Words. God love a festival where you can buy lemon slice as a snack. Shane Maloney showed a suitable deprecation of his role as keynote speaker. Did you know that he was once a PR manager for the Boy Scouts? Yes, he had a uniform. He was well received by the crowd during his reading from Something Fishy, one of his Murray Whelan books. They clucked delightedly at his description of a holiday house in Lorne, from the drive down the Great Ocean Road to the half-read Peter Carey novels.

On Sunday, we went for a literary lunch at recently reopened a la Grecque, my favourite coastal restaurant. (Saying ‘my favourite coastal restaurant’ gives the impression that you are a regular frequenter of such establishments, and I stand by this impression, though I make no assertions as to its truth.) Had a listen to Allan Campion, of Campion and Curtis, have a chat about his foodie trajectory. He started off as a cook on a naval ship, and it was in far-flung countries where he first learned about exotic produce. As the publication of The Foodies’ Diary would bear out, Campion is a great supporter of seasonal foods.

I wish I had some pictures, but Meanjin does, and Sophie Cunningham has written a bit on the surprising capacity smaller festivals have to sell books.

  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • email
  • Print

I present to you my Grade Four review of Love in a Cold Climate by Nancy Mitford.
Things I liked about this book:
  • It’s by a Mitford. The good thing about this set of British aristocrats is that, while they were boating about having affairs, being friends with fascists and designating upper-class English usage, they also turned out some good books.
  • Love in a Cold Climate continues Austen’s tradition of humorously depicting upper-class life and times, though with far more racy scandals than dear chaste Jane would ever have described. To quote the blurb: ‘When Polly, a beautiful aristocrat, declares her love for her married, lecherous uncle — who also happens to be her mother’s former lover…’ etc.
  • The characters are beyond funny. The main character, Fanny, is first known among society as the daughter of the ‘Bolter’, because her mother continually bounced from lover to lover. [Edit: the 'Bolter' is real!] Fanny’s uncle, Davey, writes the names of people he hates on a slip of paper and puts the paper in chests of drawers in accordance with a superstition that the named person will die. Cedric Montdore is the Brüno of 1940s England. Boy Dougdale, who has a keen taste for young girls, is also a keen embroiderer.
  • British names of the early 1900s are so good, always: Boy Dougdale, Mrs Chaddesley Corbett, Leopoldina Montdore.
  • Mitford’s rendering of young girls’ chatter is really charming: they twitter and coo like actual doves.
  • Great title. Apparently it’s taken from a George Orwell book.
  • It was a very pleasant read.
Things I didn’t like about this book:
  • Boring first few pages. So boring that I would have almost given up on the book if I hadn’t had to read it for book club.
  • Though the characters are hilarious, they mostly interact with each other as types with funny qualities rather than actual people. In this respect, very different to Austen, though of course that’s not a failing in itself. But it’s pretty hard to care about anything that happens to the characters since they have so little depth.
  • Fanny, the narrator, is one of the most boring narrators I have ever encountered in literature. She hardly has an interesting emotion of her own except when it’s thought necessary to marry her off. Then, she desultorily falls in love with a couple of people and settles down, hands in lap, to tell the rest of the story. The interaction between her and her indifferent Oxford don husband is pretty good, though.
  • In contrast to the rest of the book, the end is rather abrupt, neat and coy, probably owing to the fact that homosexuality was not the most acceptable topic in mid-1900s England. So, a bit ooh-ahh in 1940s; a bit nothing now.
  • When I think about this book in retrospect, I feel slightly ill because I can’t really remember reading it. Kind of like eating fairy floss, which is never to be recalled without assessing the sensory impression as somewhat disparate to its caloric intake.
  • In fact, I felt so bored thinking about this book that I had to put the review in dot points to keep myself on track. And now it’s finished, and I’ll never have to think about it again.
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • email
  • Print

Uhhhhhh Harvard has a fashion line? Maybe you can buy into the Ivy League mystique the way I pretend that working at Oxford University Press is like going to Oxford University. (It totally counts, you guys.)

Bit bored? Make a diamond.

I’m going to the Aireys Inlet Festival of Words after Textual Fantasies on Saturday (guests are awesome poets Zoe Barron and Maxine Clarke). Most of the festival sessions are free as they are sponsored by local businesses. How nice! Not sure that I’ll be able to catch Sophie Cunningham on Saturday afternoon, but I’m going to the extravagant literary lunch at a la Grecque on Sunday, and perhaps I will also catch the Spencer Zifcak session. I’m looking forward to seeing my friends’ house at Aireys again, which is so beautiful it’s a little bit ridiculous. And eating the best fish and chips I can remember.

And then MWF from the 21st. I’ll be blogging on the MWF blog throughout the festival, along with Simon, whose cool ‘vomit of a simple hive-worker’ blog you can find here.

  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • email
  • Print
August 12, 2009

The following passage from Mark Mordue’s review of Nick Cave’s The Death of Bunny Munro startled me immensely:

“The starlings have gone mad. It’s such a horrible thing. Their little babies burning in their nests. I can’t bear it, Bun,” Libby says.

When Bunny returns home, she has hung herself.

These short sentences reminded me forcibly of a scene in the only film I managed to see at MIFF this year, White Night Wedding: a typical film-festival film made bearable by Norse escarpments, primary-coloured houses scattered across islands and a blond naked man with jiggling breasts. But Anna, the first wife of the protagonist, is afflicted with a mental illness. We know she’s sick because she takes pills. We also know she’s sick because she talks about birds all the time and collects seaweed. At her most extreme, she takes her clothes off and jumps on her husband, urging him to roll around in the dew with her. Anna finds out that her husband is having an affair when runs down to see why the island’s terns have all flocked from their nesting place.

The use of the depressed nature-woman-wiccan character annoyed me so much in the film (Edit: I haven’t read Bunny Munro yet and can’t comment on it) because she’s not a character so much as a plot device. She can’t be saved; she just doesn’t fit in with the modern world, and this is so obvious (!) because she cares about birds. Rather than it being — in these cases — the husband’s responsibility to assist her, she’s a foregone sacrifice to the future of the narrative. That is, the man can move on and learn the real life lesson. Of course, she represents the husbands’ lack of care, too. But the witch-wife doesn’t really have any agency. You get to feel sorry for her but not to really know who she is.

The opposite to this is, of course, the woman-as-carer-no-romance-allowed character. Laura Linney in Love Actually, anyone?

  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • email
  • Print
August 10, 2009



My father had a rubbery mouth — from all that fat laughter of his, I guess. My lips were thinner, like my mum’s, sharpened from making judgments. I traced my eyes but they just felt like my eyes. I found my ears. I have large ears and I will never lose them. They are listening ears. According to my mum, my dad had only ever used his to listen to his own booming laughter.

Young Matilda Laimo lives on the island of Bougainville. The world recognises Bougainville as part of Papua New Guinea, but the residents of that island don’t see it that way; their skins are darker than those of the ‘redskins’ across the water, and the sounds of helicopters and gunfire never quite blend in with the island’s sounds of tropical birds. It is a little after 1990 — no one really keeps track of the date in the village — and Bougainville has been blockaded by the Papua New Guinean Government after a mining dispute that recursively turned bloody. Hardship reigns on the island, though there are still fruits in the trees and fish in the sea. Mosquitoes infect babies with malarial fevers, the generator no longer works, and it’s been a long time since anyone saw any canned food. There aren’t any shoes in Bougainville; the villagers’ clothes are slowly becoming rags.

Mr Watts is the only white man in Bougainville. He’s mysterious and funny looking: the kids call him Pop Eye, because of his constantly surprised eyes. His wife, Grace, is a native of the island. The kids watch him cart her around on a makeshift litter — him wearing a red nose, and her sitting utterly quiet. It’s a huge surprise and big news when Mr Watts offers to teach the children, who haven’t had a school for years. His only text is Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations. Every day he reads to them from the book, and they soon get caught up in the tale of Pip, Magwitch and Estella. Matilda, especially, feels more than simply enchanted by the book. She feels that Pip is a friend, someone whom she understands, though he cannot reciprocate. But the book is destroyed by the redskins, along with the islanders’ possessions and houses. The teacher’s solution is for the class to attempt to remember Pip’s story themselves.

Lloyd Jones’s light, sweet prose is utterly unpretentious. It’s not without interest, either; Matilda’s straightforward voice is studded every now and then with non-linear impressions that feather obliquely away. Matilda is charming and Mr Watts even more so, with his old-world esteem for the trope of the gentleman. If anything, they’re too perfect: as a child, Matilda constantly makes brave choices in order to protect her mother, while Mr Watts’ invitation to his pupils’ parents to teach the children what they know about life brings out the best in most of them. He is a gentleman, the most keen representation of that figure I can remember from recent literature.

Perhaps that’s why it took me a long time to start liking this book — it required a huge mode switch. I tend to read about damaged, imperfect characters (in between reading about forest sprites). I like being privy to others’ perverseness and rage, their lack and inebriation. I like problem children. But Matilda is not a problem child. Though her circumstances are tough, the purity of her character never stains. Jones’s is generous literature, and his lens picks up objects from their fairest angles. And this makes sense in the context of Mister Pip, for it is a novel that turns on the tough axis of morality. Not the shades-of-grey, multilateral and word-obscured morality that readers of postmodern fiction or even the newspaper are used to. No media, no agents, no intermediaries: nothing interrupts the life/death paradigm in Jones’s Bougainville.

Matilda’s mother, Dolores, is another kind of person entirely. Bristling with prejudice against Mr Watts on account of his difference and lack of religion, she heads the islanders’ resistance to the outsider’s overtures. Pride and fortitude bolster her against the loneliness of her husband’s long-ago departure to the mines of Australia. Though her aggressions towards the teacher bear out her desire to protect her daughter, it is Matilda who ends up protecting her, with painful and calamitous results for the entire community. In terms of the narrative, Dolores is a crucial character, Jones’s most bitter brightside. But she’s not portrayed quite richly enough to bear the burden as literary fulcrum. This is a problem: she’s a significant character.

Nevertheless, my ambivalence eventually lost its tenacity, because there’s a lot to admire in Mister Pip. First is the way in which the reader is able, through Matilda’s receptivity to the great work of Dickens, to re-experience discovering the power of literature. When Matilda spells out ‘Pip’ in seashells on the beach, it could be any reader’s memory, no matter what their first book or the context of their first reading experiences. Second is Jones’s deeply figured exploration of just what the power of literature is. Great Expectations is many things to Matilda, her family and friends: book, story, repository, scapegoat, disappointment, teacher, enemy, ashes. In some circumstances it assists; in others, divides; and in still others, it destroys. Thus, Mister Pip is not just about a book; it is about all books, and all that books can be.
Mister Pip is a book of the Pacific, of stories and of strength. Amidst the strangeness that can suffuse the distances between people of different races, Matilda and her teacher make decisions that are immensely selfless and relentlessly moral, notwithstanding that Bougainville’s residents have little choice in the tragedy that befalls them. As such, this novel tells a moving story about a part of the world even its neighbours know little about. With his soft, deft prose limning concerns that would easily attract any engaged reader, Lloyd Jones has created an affecting book well worth such a reader’s attention.
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • email
  • Print

On Textual Fantasies tomorrow (SYN 90.7 FM; 1-2pm), our focus is short fiction. Our guests are TOM CHO and CALLUM SCOTT. That’s right, kids, literary wunderbars incarnate. Accents galore! Listen in and send in questions. It will be as messy as a rainbow Paddle Pop outside of the shade.

  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • email
  • Print

One of my learned lawyer friends (LLFs) was picking at my pro-parallel importation restriction (PIRs) stance the other day. One of his quibbles was that textbooks are more expensive here than in the United States. I didn’t have any figures to hand then, but I have some now. My economic wherewithal is not quite at the level required to compare books developed in Australia for the local market to US books. But I noticed on the SMH blog–it seems I am just piggybacking their news lately; sorry, guys–that David Barnett of Pearson Australia claimed Australians were paying an average of 30% less for US textbooks than students in the US pay for the same books. I asked my boss about it, and she sent me a price comparison list of top-selling textbooks being sold both here and in the US. Some of the books are up to 50% cheaper here, because of the economies of scale that non-US territorial sales give US publishers. So there goes that argument.

Most of you will know that the Productivity Commission has recommended that the PIRs be repealed. The final hurdle is Government adoption. Book industry people can allow a small smile at the news that the ALP National Conference, held just a few days ago, resolved that ‘the Government should give priority to encouraging Australians to keep on buying Australian books and to maximising the economic, cultural and creative viability of Australian literature and Australian book industries.’ (via) To be honest, Kev, it would be a bit weird to have a giant prize that ‘celebrate[s] the contribution of Australian literature to the nation’s cultural and intellectual life’ and then knife it in the guts.

Soyons prudents, however, my chicks. Perry has, of course, beat me to the punch in saying: ‘Conferences are one thing, government decisions another.’

  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • email
  • Print