Totally boring compared to the first two. Not as fun or nailbiting as the others. I just finished reading this, and I truly cannot remember what happened. I think there was a werewolf?
Totally boring compared to the first two. Not as fun or nailbiting as the others. I just finished reading this, and I truly cannot remember what happened. I think there was a werewolf?
I try to read 50 new books a year, and this blog records my attempts to get a handle on them. Literary grandstanding or the product of an untidy mind? No one knows.
To the numbers: when I started this blog I was 23 years old. The life expectancy for an Australian female is 83 years. 60 reading years left x 50 books = 3000 books.
Why yes, it is very literal. Some might also say it is numerical.
Please note that as of May 25, 2011, books I received through publicity channels are denoted by an asterisk. Earlier posts will include this information in the text (usually indirectly, e.g. by reference to a published review or interview).
About me: find it out
estelle dot tang at gmail dot com

Cass | 18th Feb 10 | 2:21 pm |
The third one is the worst! It gets better after that, I promise.
estelle | 20th Feb 10 | 1:57 am |
Oh, I wish you hadn’t said that! Now I will have to commit to all four, and my blog will just be red lips on black background forevermore.
Cass | 20th Feb 10 | 3:55 am |
I would feel guilty, only it makes me feel slightly better about myself when other intelligent people read them. I will take one for the team however and warn you against the Aurora Teagarden series. I threw some of those books across the room in reading annoyance!
(May I also advise getting to the other books before the True Blood cover makeovers? The drawings are much better and less, uh, lippy.